Updates from the CEO · Read Albert Roberson’s latest update →

Frameworks

Framework

Title VII

Protection against workplace discrimination, harassment, and retaliation, where the retaliation claim is often the one that lands.

What the law is

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. It reaches hiring, firing, pay, promotion, and the terms and conditions of employment, and it prohibits harassment that creates a hostile work environment.

It also prohibits retaliation against anyone who complains of discrimination or takes part in an investigation. In practice, retaliation is where employers most often lose: the underlying complaint may not substantiate, but an adverse action taken afterward, a schedule change, a poor review, an exclusion, becomes the claim that does.

A defensible response requires a neutral investigation, a consistent process, and disciplined documentation of the legitimate, non-retaliatory reasons behind any employment decision that follows a complaint.

What it requires

01

Fair, neutral investigation

Investigations that are defensible whether or not the underlying complaint substantiates.

02

Anti-retaliation discipline

Tracking adverse actions and requiring a documented, legitimate rationale after any complaint.

03

Consistent process

A grievance and reporting process applied the same way every time.

04

Documentation

A record that shows the decision, and the reason for it, at each step.

How Fractional Coordinator helps

Fractional & interim coordination

Senior Title VII coordination during a gap, a surge, or as a standing partner, owning the role, not just advising on it.

Fractional leadership

Neutral investigations

Defensible Title VII investigations, from intake to a written report built to survive review.

Investigations

Certification & training

Title VII certification, workshops, and refreshers through the Learning Institute.

Certified training

Why institutions bring us in

Workplace fluency

EEOC standards, state analogs, and the realities of an academic workplace, held in the same analysis.

Faculty and staff respondents

Tenure, collective bargaining agreements, and shared governance shape what process is possible. We work inside those constraints, not around them.

Independent where HR cannot be

When the respondent is senior or the matter touches HR itself, an outside neutral protects the process and the people running it.

Litigation-aware records

Findings written with the deposition in mind, clear about evidence, standards, and how conclusions were reached.

Have a workplace matter that needs to hold up?

Get in touch