Updates from the CEO

The latest update from Albert Roberson, on where the civil rights docket is heading this term.

Read the update

The frameworks we work in

42 U.S.C. § 2000e · 29 CFR Part 1604

Title VII

Prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It governs the workforce side of an institution, and it is enforced by a different agency, on a different clock, than the frameworks covering students.

What it covers

Discrimination

In hiring, pay, promotion, discipline, assignment, and termination, on any protected basis.

Harassment

Including sexual harassment and hostile work environment claims, whether by supervisors, coworkers, or third parties.

Religious accommodation

The duty to accommodate sincerely held religious beliefs and practices absent undue hardship.

Retaliation

Against employees who oppose discrimination or participate in a proceeding. Retaliation claims are the most frequently filed of all.

Who it applies to

Employers
Employers with 15 or more employees, including public and private institutions, plus employment agencies and labor organizations.
Enforcement
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. A charge generally precedes a lawsuit, and filing deadlines are short, commonly 180 or 300 days depending on the state.
Overlap
A single set of facts can raise Title VII and Title IX at once when the person is both an employee and part of the education program. Deciding which framework governs is the first decision in the file.

What has to be in place

The structural obligations, stated plainly. Specifics vary by institution and by state.

  1. A published policy

    Covering discrimination, harassment, and retaliation, with more than one way to report.

  2. A reporting path that does not run through the problem

    Employees must be able to report without going to the person the complaint concerns.

  3. Prompt investigation

    Conducted by someone competent and sufficiently independent, with contemporaneous documentation.

  4. Findings and action

    A determination applying the correct standard, followed by action reasonably calculated to end the conduct.

  5. Anti-retaliation practice

    Active monitoring after a complaint, not merely a sentence in the handbook.

  6. Training and records

    For managers and for the people who receive first reports, with retention that survives a charge filed later.

Where it usually goes wrong

Employment matters demand procedural rigor that student-side processes often lack. The recurring failure is an investigation conducted informally by a manager close to the parties, with no contemporaneous notes, no defined standard of proof, and no written findings. By the time a charge arrives, the institution cannot show what it did or why.

Read the questions we get

This page is a general overview written by compliance practitioners, not legal advice. Fractional Coordinator is a civil rights compliance firm, not a law firm. Regulations change, and how a framework applies depends on your institution and your facts. Confirm with counsel before making an institutional decision.

Trust, operationalized

Work with us

Engagements begin with a scoping conversation. We look at the portfolio you are carrying, the exposure you are managing, and the seat you need covered, then we tell you plainly whether we are the right firm for it.

Book a call